Posts Tagged ‘Ronal Reagan’

MIGOP 1st District Vice-Chair Calls for “Purging” Gays from the GOP

April 1, 2013

Yesterday, a shockingly extreme blog post written by Michigan Republican’s 1st District Vice-Chair Mary Sears was posted on the Schoolcraft County Republican Party’s website by the site’s administrators.  The post is titled, “End Of The GOP?”, and its premise is, “For too long the GOP has misinterpreted the big tent idea of Ronald Regan [sic].”

UPDATE: Since yesterday, the site administrators have placed the following disclaimer: “The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. While every caution has been taken to provide our readers with most accurate information and honest analysis, please use your discretion before taking any decisions based on the information in this blog.”

Toward the end of the post, Sears writes, “How then can we as Christians stay in a party that adopts Homosexuality [sic] into the fabric of the tent. I say we cannot. Homosexuals make up less than one percent of the total population. They must prey on our children to increase their numbers. Why then, would we, as a party, entertain this perversion? We as a party should be purging this perversion and send them to a party with a much bigger tent. When we lose track of foundational principles we lose the very essence of our party. By throwing God under the bus we become nothing more than the poor Democrats who have lost their way and by doing so have lost their party.”

Let’s focus in on that middle sentence… “We as a party should be purging this perversion and send them to a party with a much bigger tent.”  We as a party should be purging homosexuals and sending them to the Democratic Party?  Does that strike anyone else as wrong?

Now let’s take a look at the Republican Party platform… you know, the one that was adopted by the Republican National Committee last year and represents what Republicans nationwide believe: “We embrace the principle that all Americans should be treated with respect and dignity.”  And what was it that Ronald Reagan said?  Something like, “The person who agrees with you 80 percent of the time is a friend and an ally, not a 20 percent traitor.”

Clearly Sears’ idea of purging gays from the party fits neither with Reagan’s ideology, nor the GOP’s platform.  And that’s fine if it’s her personal opinion, but this woman represents the 1st District Republican Committee.  If that wasn’t bad enough, the Schoolcraft County GOP administrators posted that post on their blog–with no disclaimer of any kind.  A county GOP committee endorsing district executive board member advocating the idea of purging people from the party based on one issue?  That seems extreme, to put it lightly.

It also seems counterproductive to one of the stated purposes of the County Committee in its bylaws, which is to “benefit the general welfare of the Republicans of Schoolcraft County”.  In 2010, gays, lesbians, and bisexuals accounted for 3% of the vote, and 29% identified as supporting Republican Congressmen.  In 2012, they accounted for 5% of the vote, and 22% identified as voting for Romney.  The County Committee’s goal is to benefit the party, yet they support “purging” a group of voters So we should purge a group that adds 1% of the vote to the GOP column?  And while 1% doesn’t sound like a lot, why would you willingly ostracize a group of people who are trying to help you?

It is one thing to defend traditional marriage–something that remains a part of the party’s platform.  It is an entirely different thing to call for “purging” gays from the party because they are a “perversion” in the minds of some.  Ms. Sears seems to have ignored the party platform clause that calls for “respect and dignity.”  Traditional values can be defended in a respectful and dignified way.

We as a party cannot afford to lose any voters, and I welcome any gay, lesbian, or bisexual voter who agrees with even 51% of the party platform (for that matter, I welcome anyone who is willing to vote for Republicans more often than Democrats).  And to any gays, lesbians, or bisexuals reading this, let me tell you that Ms. Sears and the Schoolcraft County GOP do does not speak for the Republican Party that I believe in and defend.  And that is why I believe it is so important to write what I am writing today.  The members of the GOP who are embarrassed and offended by the hatred coming from some in our party need to stand up for what is right and defend what is actually in the party platform–respect and dignity.

Done Ranting,

Ranting Republican

UPDATE: When I wrote my original post, the SCRP’s blog had the header, “Published March 31, 2013 | By SCRP“. Since then, I have talked to the chairman of the SCRP who has informed me that while the post was posted by “SCRP” (they should probably create a “Guest” account to post unofficial blog posts), they post opinion pieces from many people, and blog posts do not represent the SCRP.  I have since edited this post by striking out anything that has been revealed to be inaccurate.  I still think the original post should have been taken down by the SCRP, as it blatantly violates the party platform, but the SCRP has put a disclaimer up and posted a copy of this blog post.

Why the Economic Stimulus Package Was a Terrible Idea

March 21, 2008

Alright, so I was looking around Senator Chuck Hagel’s (R-NE) website to see about his new book, and I stumbled across this press release:

Hagel Statement on Vote Against Senate Economic Stimulus Package
 
February 7th, 2008 – U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel issued the following statement today after voting against the passed United States Senate economic stimulus package:“In the last few years we have overbuilt, overmortgaged, overleveraged and abused credit. The market is now self-correcting.

“This economic stimulus package is wrongheaded, short-sighted and will only drive our country deeper into debt and continue to perpetuate this irresponsible mantra of spend, spend, spend. We are borrowing money that our children are going to have to pay back. Flying over America dropping rebate checks that we can’t cover doesn’t solve anything. This isn’t free money.”  

###

I’ve gotta say – I will always love that man and his politics – I disagree with him on a couple of things things, but he is by far my favorite politician (other than Reagan) – it still saddens me that he’s retiring, but I hope he gets back into it.  I told him on my last visit to D.C. (I should post a picture of that) that if he ever runs for anything, he has my full support.

OK, back to economics:

Here’s the bill that he was referring to: House Resolution 5140: H.R. 5140 Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 – here’s the summary, at least where I have a problem – the tax rebate stuff is fine, but Title II is dangerous:

Title II: Housing GSE and FHA Loan Limits – (Sec. 201) Raises the statutory ceiling on the maximum original principal obligation of a mortgage originated between July 1, 2007, and December 31, 2008, that may be purchased by either the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac). Disregards mortgages purchased with the increased ceiling amount for purposes of meeting certain housing goals established under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992.

Expresses the sense of Congress that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should securitize mortgages acquired pursuant to the increased conforming loan limits of this Act if the manner of securitization does not: (1) impose additional costs for mortgages originated, purchased, or securitized under existing limits; or (2) interfere with the goal of adding liquidity to the market.

(Sec. 202) Establishes a temporary loan limit increase for FHA-insured mortgages in specified high-cost areas for which a borrower received credit approval by December 31, 2008.

Grants the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) discretionary authority to increase loan limits in 2008 based upon the size and location of residences in particular areas.

Directs the Secretary to publish the median house prices and mortgage principal obligation limits as revised by this Act not later than 30 days after its enactment.

And here’s why it’s dangerous: As Senator Hagel said, “we have … overmortgaged … and abused credit.  And what does this act do?  Raises limits on mortgages dealing with approved credit.  But here’s the problem (as I addressed in this post: https://inkslwc.wordpress.com/2008/03/19/monopoly-electronic-banking-credit-cards-terrible-for-kids/):

  1. People bought overpriced houses.
  2. They couldn’t afford these houses.
  3. Mortgages were given to people who NEVER should’ve been given mortgages, especially for as much as was loaned.
  4. People got adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs), which are normally used for people with bad credit, because it puts more of the risk on the person taking out the mortgage.
    1. The problem was that SO many people took out ARMs and then couldn’t pay.
    2. The banks don’t want to foreclose, because they can’t resell the property because the market is now in a state where most of the houses are overpriced, and too many people are already in financial trouble from previous mortgages.
  5. Another problem is credit – we have people all over using credit cards for whatever they want.  Rule #1 of a credit card: NEVER buy something that you couldn’t pay with cash.  Credit cards are meant for convenience so that you don’t have to carry around a wad of cash or keep all your money in a checking account where you aren’t earning interest, NOT as a secondary source for spending money.  Rule #2: Pay off the balance monthly so you don’t get nailed with interest.
  6. Yet another problem: All this $0 downpayment stuff – sure, it looks good, but that just means that you’re going to have to pay that $500 later PLUS interest!

Americans really need to go and take a simple budget or economics class, because these quick fixes are only going to hurt us.

Why is it the government’s job to fix problems that we created?  If I go out and buy a house I can’t afford and then can’t make payments, why is it the government’s job to right my stupidity?  It’s not, but ever since FDR did it in the depression, we’ve become dependent.  Herbert Hoover was right in not helping the people who just kept investing all their money in the stock market – their stupidity cost them.  Now, I understand that banks shouldn’t have been investing money that they didn’t actually have, but I’m not talking about that – I’m talking about the individuals.

If Americans aren’t careful, the economy will be slaughtered and the government won’t be able to bail people out time after time.  LEARN from your mistakes and don’t make them again, PLEASE for the sake of all of us!

Done Ranting,

Ranting Republican
add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! ::


%d bloggers like this: