The U.S. Digital TV Transition Happens Today

Well, today is the day that most TV stations will be switching over to a solely digital signal (if they haven’t done so already).  So, I figured it’d be appropriate to talk about the politics of the tranistion.

First, if you’re looking for information about the transition and how it will affect you, you can check out, a website run by the Federal Communications Commission.

Personally, I think the forced transition to digital is an overstepping of the government.  I personally don’t see the need for the government to do this, and I think the FCC has been deceptive to the American people in selling the DTV conversion.

In the FAQ, the FCC answer’s the question, “Why are we switching to DTV?” with an answer that seems like it’s the government doing great things for the American public:

An important benefit of the switch to all-digital broadcasting is that it will free up parts of the valuable broadcast spectrum for public safety communications (such as police, fire departments, and rescue squads). Also, some of the spectrum will be auctioned to companies that will be able to provide consumers with more advanced wireless services (such as wireless broadband).

Consumers also benefit because digital broadcasting allows stations to offer improved picture and sound quality, and digital is much more efficient than analog. For example, rather than being limited to providing one analog program, a broadcaster is able to offer a super sharp “high definition” (HD) digital program or multiple “standard definition” (SD) digital programs simultaneously through a process called “multicasting.” Multicasting allows broadcast stations to offer several channels of digital programming at the same time, using the same amount of spectrum required for one analog program. So, for example, while a station broadcasting in analog on channel 7 is only able to offer viewers one program, a station broadcasting in digital on channel 7 can offer viewers one digital program on channel 7-1, a second digital program on channel 7-2, a third digital program on channel 7-3, and so on. This means more programming choices for viewers. Further, DTV can provide interactive video and data services that are not possible with analog technology.

Now, all of that is true, but I find it deceptive the way that they organized that.  They placed the public safety section at the top, when in actuality, only 4 channels (63, 64, 68, and 69) will be reassigned to police departments, fire departments, etc.  Most of the analog spectrum has been sold off to companies such as AT&T or Verizon.

On the one hand, it’s great that the government is making some money by selling those frequencies, but think of how much money was spent on digital converters!  Congress budgeted anywhere from $890 million to $1.5 billion.  Unfortunately, I haven’t been able to find how much money the government is making off of the analog frequency sales, but they sure are spending a lot on converters.

But the biggest reason that I oppose the forced transition to digital is that I don’t see why the government should care.  If they want to reallocate a few frequencies to public safety departments, that’s fine, but that doesn’t mean you have to get rid of ALL analog television.  I just see this as the government being more involved than it has to be, especially at a time when the government has more important things to worry about.

Personally, I would’ve liked to have used Canada’s original method – allow the markets to control who switches and when – if people like digital, the TV stations will respond to the demand.  Unfortunately, even Canada gave in and will require most analog frequencies to stop broadcasting by August 31, 2011.

If you’d like to see the full legislation, a copy of the Digital Transition and Public Safety Act of 2005 can be found here.

Again, if you need information about the DTV conversion, check out, and if you’d like to see what digital stations should be available in your area, check out the map feature here:

Done Ranting,

Ranting Republican


Tags: , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “The U.S. Digital TV Transition Happens Today”

  1. RightWingReform Says:

    I actually like the switch because it frees up airwaves. Not just the channels, but the actual airwaves. People can receive signals from farther away than they originally did, giving them access to more information. Would I rather see it bid out to private companies and determined by the market? Yes. But I’m not going to complain too much, because I think the switch is very beneficial.

  2. @robotsoul Says:

    I agree a forced switch seems a little paternal. However the upside is that it has created some (temporary) jobs. Check this out:

  3. Bowler Says:

    Digital TV or Analog TV, it’s the same either way… they both exist to transmit as many ads as possible

  4. Sean Says:

    Whether it was necessary to free up bandwidth or not, there are a few things here that get to me.

    Firstly, it has been touted that “if you have an antenna, all you need to do is get a converter box”. My grandmother lives in the middle of nowhere in Ortonville, she’s got a directional roof-mounted antenna, and where channels would normally come in a bit fuzzy, with the digital, they lock up and freeze. Analog provides for a tolerance, you don’t mind dealing with fuzzy, you get the channel. Digital, it’s all or nothing, you either have clear picture, or you have pixels freezing left and right. It looks like she’s going to need a new antenna, and an amplifier, to get these channels problem-free. Now, this is common sense, the technology she’s currently using is about three decades old, but again, it was sold to the people as “you just need a new box, and nothing else”… From an everyman perspective, that’s a royal pain, and a lot more to follow.

    The real thing that kills me here is the fact that the government has paid for it. When everything went from VHS to DVD, I didn’t get a government check to pay for me to upgrade my videos. LP to 8 track (pretty much before my time) to cassette to CD to MP3, I didn’t get a government check to pay for these new albums… Nor did I expect one. Why is 40% of my check being taken so that my grandmother can watch ‘The View’?!? I just don’t get that.

  5. Satellite PC TV Says:

    Who offers satellite TV? There are two major satellite dish providers in the United States. The largest is DIRECTV, with about 16 million US subscribers. DIRECTV is partially owned by News Corporation, who bought their stake when it was sold by Hughes. The second company, Dish Network, is owned by Echostar Communications, and has over 12 million subscribers. For those with more land available to them, the original large dish (C-Band) service is available. This website focuses on comparing Dish Network to DIRECTV.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: