Vermont Legalized Gay Marriage the Right Way

Alright, this is part 2 in my series on gay marriage.  For my blog post disagreeing with the Iowa Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage, click here.  Now, in contrast, we have the state of Vermont, whose legislature overrode their Governor’s veto on a gay marriage bill.  And while I disagree with the legislature on this issue, I honor the fact that they legalized marriage through fair legal processes instead of having a  judge or a court butcher the law in  order to get gay marriage legalized.

Last week, both the Vermont House of Representatives and Senate voted for the bill (S. 115).  There’s no record of the Senate voting on it originally (the rules were suspended and it was sent to the House), but the House voted 94-52 for the bill.  That was 4 votes shy of overriding the Governor’s veto.  Governor Jim Douglas then vetoed the bill, but some House members switched over and the result of the vote “Shall the bill pass the failure of the Governor to sign not withstanding?” (on April 7th) was 100-49 (the bare minimum needed for it to reach the 2/3 threshold).  The same motion (worded “Shall the bill pass, notwithstanding the refusal of the Governor to approve the bill?”) easily passed the Senate earlier that day, 23-5.

I’m not going to post it here, because it’s 11 pages long, but if you’re interested in reading the bill, you can find it here: http://www.leg.state.vt.us/docs/2010/bills/Passed/S-115.pdf.

Again, I personally disagree with the bill, but it is Vermont’s right to legalize gay marriage.  As I said in my last post, I am opposed to the federal government legislating marriage, whether that means banning or legalizing gay marriage (unless the Constitution is amended, in which case, federal government intervention would be legal, but I would still think it’s the federal government getting involved where it doesn’t need to be / shouldn’t be).

Most likely, this legalization will stick, since I don’t see Vermont passing a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage (but like I said earlier, I think Iowa will).

Done Ranting,

Ranting Republican

4 Responses to “Vermont Legalized Gay Marriage the Right Way”

  1. Sean Says:

    I absolutely have to agree with you here… Ultimately, it is up to the PEOPLE of the state to make these decisions. Not the state government to force it upon them after they overwhelmingly voted no.

  2. Solon Says:

    I find this fascinating, I’m assuming you are consistent in your belief and decry the SCOTUS decision on Loving vs. Virginia which also, to paraphrase what you said, “butcher the law in order to get interracial marriage legalized.”

  3. inkslwc Says:

    No, and here’s why. Loving v. Virginia was overturned because it DID violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment because it discriminated based on a classifications of people (that classification being race).

    The question that the Iowa Supreme Court asked was if sexual orientation is a classification of people, and ruled that it was. I disagree with that, and believe that they overstepped their bounds.

  4. Political Blog Weekly: 10 April 2009 | U.S. Common Sense Says:

    […] "Vermont Legalized Gay Marriage the Right Way" Originally published:  8 April 2009 Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense Summary:  Reviewing how Vermont legalized gay marriage by passing the legislation through the state government rather than through the courts. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: